The great deepwater debate: operate or partner in US Gulf of Mexico Report

Insight 26 March 2019

This report is currently unavailable

Share link

First name
Last name
Job Title
Company
Email
Telephone

Country

Message

Consent

Please keep me informed about Wood Mackenzie products, services and events.

Submit Category

For details on how your data is used and stored, see our Privacy Notice.

- FAQs about online orders
- Find out more about subscriptions

*Please note that this report only includes an Excel data file if this is indicated in "What's included" below

Report summary

Lower commodity prices and competition from tight oil drove consolidation in the US GoM over the past several years. There are almost 25% fewer companies in the deepwater than just five years ago. As a result, companies have fewer choices when selecting partners and the decision to operate or not has moved front and center. In this insight, we explore the operated and non-operated landscape and discuss the benefits and disadvantages of both. We also examine how the terrain is shifting, and what it takes to be an effective operator in the deepwater US GoM.

Executive summary
Peers stick together, but not always
Operating: the good, the bad, and the unexpected
Non-operating: pick your play
- The state of the US GoM
- Heavy operators (>75% remaining commercial operated reserves)
- Balanced (25% to 75% remaining commercial operated reserves)
- Light operators (<25% remaining commercial operated reserves)
- Non-operaters (no remaining commercial operated reserves)
Sink or swim